Quasi-experimental research revealed improved quality of life in chest trauma patients following early mobilization and exercises, suggesting effective rehabilitation strategies.
Background: Early mobilization and exercises following chest trauma have been associated with improved respiratory efficiency, which enhance patients' ability to participate in daily activities and better functional outcomes during recovery Aim: To valuate quality-of-life among patients with chest trauma prior to and following implementation of supported early mobilization and exercises. Design: A quasi-experimental research design. Setting: The study was conducted at Main Assiut University Hospital. Subjects:120 adult patients with chest trauma divided equally into study and control groups. Tools: Patient assessment sheet, Brief pain inventory scale, and Euro Quality of Life 5-dimensions, 5 levels used for data collection. Results: revealed that demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between two groups. Both groups had similar mean age (45.67 ± 14.64 years) and majority were males (61.7% in the study group, 65.0% in the control group). Pain severity decreased from 35.83 ± 4.76 at baseline to 24.25 ± 7.40 after one month and pain interference dropped from 66.83 ± 4.06 to 44.96 ± 12.81 (p= .001). Also, the study group showed significant improvement in their quality of life, with some participants reaching perfect (3.3%), very good (5.8%), and good health status category(9.2%). However, 32.5% of the control group remained in the "extremely impaired" category. Conclusion: Supported early mobilization and exercises significantly improved quality of life in patients with chest trauma. Recommendation: Individualized supported early mobilization and exercises plans are essential for patients with chest trauma to accelerate recovery and improve quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rashwan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: