Analysis highlights factors affecting treatment choices in patients with metastatic cervical cancer, suggesting roles of various medical organizations.
Regional responses on factors influencing physicians’ treatment choices for patients with mCC. The importance of each factor was rated on a scale of 1 (not important at all) to 10 (extremely important), with scores categorized into the top three boxes (10/9/8), middle four boxes (7/6/5/4), and bottom three boxes (3/2/1). ESMO, European Society of Medical Oncology; KSGO/KGOG, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology/Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group; NET, net total; NHRI, National Health Research Institute; ORR, overall response rate; SGOP, Society of Gynecologic Oncologists of the Philippines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: