Field experiments demonstrate pedestrian detection accuracy of 97.5% in heavy vehicles, highlighting effectiveness under adverse weather conditions.
Pedestrian accidents involving heavy vehicles such as trucks and buses remain a critical safety issue, primarily due to structural blind spots. While existing systems like radar-based FCW and BSD have been adopted, they are not fully optimized for pedestrian detection, particularly under adverse weather conditions. This study focused on the empirical validation of a 360-degree pedestrian collision avoidance system using multichannel ultrasonic sensors specifically designed for heavy-duty vehicles. Eight sensors were strategically positioned to ensure full spatial coverage, and scenario-based field experiments were conducted under controlled rain (50 mm/h) and fog (visibility <30 m) conditions. Pedestrian detection performance was evaluated across six distance intervals (50–300 cm) using indicators such as mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of variation (CV), and false-negative rate (FNR). The results demonstrated that the system maintained average accuracy of 97.5% even under adverse weather. Although rain affected near-range detection (FNR up to 17.5% at 100 cm), performance remained robust at mid-to-long ranges. Fog conditions led to lower variance and fewer detection failures. These empirical findings demonstrate the system’s effectiveness and robustness in real-world conditions and emphasize the importance of evaluating both distance accuracy and detection reliability in pedestrian safety applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: