Retrospective observational study reveals pediatric cervical spine injuries in 102 patients, indicating high mortality and frequent associated injuries.
Abstract Purpose This study aims to describe and analyse pediatric cervical spine (C-spine) trauma over 32 years at a level 1 trauma centre. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients younger than 16 years hospitalised after C-spine trauma from 1991 to 2022. Data on demographics, injury mechanisms, affected levels, associated injuries, neurological deficits (Frankel scale), treatments, and outcomes were analysed. Patients were divided into two age groups: <8 years (Group A) and 9–16 years (Group B). Injuries were categorised as SCIWORA or skeletal, and by level - upper (C0 to C2) or lower (C3 to C7). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v29.0 (p < 0.05). Results A total of 102 patients were identified (67% male; 65% >8 years). Younger children had more upper C-spine injuries (55.6%), while lower injuries were more common in Group B (53%) (p = 0.006). mechanisms included motor vehicle accidents, pedestrian accidents, falls, and sports injuries. Associated injuries were present in 59% of cases, mainly head trauma. SCIWORA occurred in 14.7% of patients, with MRI-confirmed cord contusions in 60% of these. Most patients (74.7%) underwent conservative treatment. Neurological deficits were present in 38% of patients, and 51.2% showed improvement. The mortality rate was 16.5%, significantly higher among those with neurological impairment (p = 0.004). Conclusion Pediatric C-spine trauma is uncommon. MRI is essential for detecting spinal cord injury in SCIWORA. The high prevalence and impact of associated injuries on mortality highlight the need for thorough primary evaluation. Multicenter studies are necessary to improve management strategies and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Correia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: