Lung sound analysis improves disease detection in healthcare, suggesting on-device AI enhances data security.
Following the COVID-19 pandemic, public interest in healthcare has significantly in-creased, emphasizing the importance of early disease detection through lung sound analysis. Lung sounds serve as a critical biomarker in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases, and numerous deep learning-based approaches have been actively explored for this purpose. Existing lung sound classification models have demonstrated high accuracy, benefiting from recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. However, these models often rely on transmitting data to computationally intensive servers for processing, introducing potential security risks due to the transfer of sensitive medical information over networks. To mitigate these concerns, on-device AI has garnered growing attention as a promising solution for protecting healthcare data. On-device AI enables local data processing and inference directly on the device, thereby enhancing data security compared to server-based schemes. Despite these advantages, on-device AI is inherently limited by computational constraints, while conventional models typically require substantial processing power to maintain high performance. In this study, we propose a lightweight lung sound classification model designed specifically for on-device environments. The proposed scheme extracts audio features using Mel spectrograms, chromagrams, and Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), which are converted into image representations and stacked to form the model input. The lightweight model performs convolution operations tailored to both temporal and frequency–domain characteristics of lung sounds. Comparative experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves superior inference performance while maintaining a significantly smaller model size than conventional classification schemes, making it well-suited for deployment on resource-constrained devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: