Retrospective analysis finds bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA improve lung cancer staging, suggesting better diagnostic outcomes.
Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Timely and accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial for treatment decisions. Objective: To assess the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic/staging yield of a bronchoscopy-based pathway supported by EBUS-TBNA in a regional Romanian center. Bronchoscopy combined with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) may reduce the need for surgical confirmation, yet its implementation in regional centers is inconsistent. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 67 patients with suspected lung cancer evaluated at a regional oncology center between December 2023 and February 2024. All patients underwent bronchoscopy, and EBUS-TBNA was performed in those with mediastinal lymphadenopathy on imaging, with endoscopic tissue biopsies (endobronchial/EBUS-TBNA). Demographic, clinical, histological, and molecular data were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Among the 67 patients, 42 (62.7%) underwent EBUS-TBNA. The majority were diagnosed in advanced stages (stage III–IV: 83.6%), with adenocarcinoma being the most frequent histological subtype. PD-L1 expression was positive in 52.2% of cases, and p63 in 67.2%. No significant procedural complications occurred, and adequate tissue sampling for histopathological and molecular analyses was achieved in all cases. Associations were found between PD-L1 and advanced TNM stage (p = 0.026), as well as between p63 status and TNM stage (p = 0.002). Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility and safety of a bronchoscopy-based diagnostic and staging algorithm supported by EBUS-TBNA, achieving reliable sampling and avoiding surgical confirmation in a regional oncology setting. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olteanu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: