Comprehensive survey identifies SSR markers and mitochondrial genome in large yellow croakers, highlighting genetic diversity.
The Naozhou stock of large yellow croakers (Larimichthys crocea) exhibits unique phenotypic traits and high genetic diversity, making it a valuable resource for selective breeding and genetic conservation in aquaculture. Despite its importance, simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers have not been developed for this stock, which limits efforts in genetic evaluation, breeding optimization, and sustainable utilization of this commercially important species. In this study, 195,263 SSRs were identified from the genome of the Naozhou stock of large yellow croaker, covering a total length of 16,578,990 bp with a density of 288 bp/Mb. Dinucleotide repeats were the most common, with the AC motif being the most prevalent. The frequency of SSR markers ranged from 245.63 to 346.60 per Mb. A total of 30 primer pairs were synthesized, of which 28 pairs (93.3%) successfully amplified clear and reproducible bands in PCR assays. Among these, 28 SSR markers exhibited distinct and reproducible bands following gel electrophoresis. For eight SSR loci, the number of alleles (Na) ranged from 4 to 22 (mean = 11.375), while the effective number of alleles (Ne) ranged from 1.5401 to 10.4727 (mean = 5.6475). The assembled mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) was 16,467 bp in length and comprised 37 genes, including 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 tRNA genes, and 2 rRNA genes. The total sequence length of the PCGs was 11,431 bp, accounting for 69.4% of the mtDNA. A large portion of the PCGs (5) used incomplete stop codons (e.g., nad2, nad3, cox2), while others used TAA stop codons (e.g., nad6, nad5, TrnT). The mtDNA encoded a total of 3808 codons, with UAA showing the highest relative synonymous codon usage value. The SSR markers and mtDNA data generated in this study provide valuable tools for future genetic breeding and genomic research on the Naozhou stock of large yellow croakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: