Current insights on AAR-reactive mineral fillers in concrete point to knowledge gaps regarding their properties and effects.
The depletion of natural resources and the increasing interest in reducing CO2 emissions have heightened the demand for alternative materials in concrete production. A viable approach is to lower the clinker-to-cementitious materials ratio by partially replacing clinker with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and/or alternative materials such as aggregate mineral fillers (AMFs). As the availability of SCMs is expected to decline, AMFs have been increasingly explored, including those derived from aggregate processing and susceptible to alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR). However, the behaviour of AAR-reactive AMFs in concrete remains poorly understood. This paper summarizes the current state of the art and identifies knowledge gaps concerning the use of AAR-reactive AMFs, focusing on the roles of mineralogy, particle size, replacement content, and the test methods used to assess AAR-induced development and associated microscopic and mechanical deterioration. A consistent terminology is also proposed to support future research. Finally, a theoretical foundation to understand the role of AAR-reactive AMFs in mortar and concrete is provided, and the key knowledge gaps are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coutinho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: