Simulation improves sea surface roughness retrieval accuracy in remote sensing, suggesting noise management benefits.
Sea surface roughness (SSR) retrieval is a frontier topic in the field of ocean remote sensing, and SSR retrieval based on multi angle, passive, visible spectrum remote sensing images has been proven to have potential applications. Traditional multi angle retrieval models ignored the nonlinear relationship between radiation and digital signals, resulting in low accuracy in SSR retrieval using visible spectrum remote sensing images. Therefore, we analyze the transmission characteristics of signals and random noise in sea surface imaging, establish signals and noise transmission models for typical sea surface imaging visible spectrum remote sensing systems using Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) and Time Delay Integration-Charge Coupled Device (TDI-CCD) sensors, and propose a model for SSR retrieval using multi angle passive visible spectrum remote sensing images. The proposed model can effectively suppress the noise behavior in the imaging link and improve the accuracy of SSR retrieval. Simulation experiments show that when simulating the retrieval of multi angle visible spectrum images obtained using CMOS or TDI-CCD imaging systems with four SSR levels of 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, and 0.05, the proposed model relative errors using two angles are decreased by 4.0%, 2.7%, 2.3%, and 2.0% and 6.5%, 4.3%, 3.7%, and 3.2%, compared with the relative errors of the model without considering noise behavior, which are 7.0%, 6.7%, 7.8%, and 9.0% and 9.5%, 8.3%, 9.0%, and 10.2%. When using more fitting data, the relative errors of the model were decreased by 5.0%, 2.7%, 2.5%, and 2.0% and 7.0%, 5.0%, 4.3%, and 3.2%, compared with the relative errors of the model without considering noise behavior, which are 8.5%, 7.0%, 8.0%, and 9.4%, and 10.0%, 8.7%, 9.3%, and 10.0%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: