Radiotheranostics improved imaging and delayed tumor growth in acute myeloid leukemia, highlighting potential for patient-specific therapies.
There remains an unmet clinical need for improved treatment strategies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Although radiopharmaceutical therapies targeting non-cancer-selective antigens have shown promise in AML, their clinical utility is often limited by prolonged bone marrow suppression. Using a unique proteomics-based strategy, we recently identified the active conformation of integrin-β2 (aITGB2) as a novel, tumor-selective target for AML. Importantly, this conformational epitope is expressed widely on AML cells but minimally on normal marrow progenitors/healthy tissues. Here we first confirmed widespread aITGB2 expression on AML tumors that was largely independent of tumor genotype or prior therapeutic regimen. We developed diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals targeting aITGB2 utilizing a conformation-specific antibody (clone 7065). PET/CT imaging with 89Zr and 134Ce-labeled 7065 in AML models revealed high target-mediated uptake, greater than that compared to standard of care [18F]-FDG. PET/CT imaging with [89Zr]DFO*-7065 showed reduced binding to normal bone marrow and immune cells in humanized immune system mice compared to [89Zr]DFO*-anti-CD33. For therapy, we developed [225Ac]Macropa-PEG4-7065 using an optimized chelator-linker combination. Treatment with [225Ac]Macropa-PEG4-7065 in Nomo-1 and PDX AML disseminated models delayed tumor growth and improved overall survival compared to controls, including [225Ac]DOTA-anti-CD33, a clinical stage-radioimmunotherapy under evaluation in AML. Relapsed tumors demonstrated persistent aITGB2 expression, supporting continued development of fractionated dosing schemes, and proteomics analysis indicated activation of TCA cycle and carbon metabolism pathways, consistent with therapy-induced stress responses. These findings highlight [89Zr]DFO*-7065 and [225Ac]Macropa-7065 as a promising aITGB2-targeted theranostic pair with potential for imaging and treatment in future clinical translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wadhwa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: