Longitudinal study of 95 patients with ethambutol optic neuropathy shows changes in visual acuity and OCT metrics, indicating potential irreversible damage.
Aims To evaluate structural and visual functional parameters in ethambutol-related toxic optic neuropathy (EON). Methods In this prospective study, we recruited 95 adults with EON presenting within 1 month of onset and 100 age-matched healthy controls. Best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart), colour vision (Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), Humphrey visual field analysis (HVF 30–2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm-FAST), visual evoked response and spectral domain optical coherence tomography for macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGC-IPL), retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and papillomacular bundle (PMB) analyses were done at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Results Almost 52% eyes showed significant visual improvement of ≥ 2 Snellen lines after stopping the drug. RNFL (cases-100.84±21.87 µm vs controls-98.05±7.21 µm; p=0.37) and PMB thickness (cases-51.10±17.26 µm vs controls-53.45±6.42 µm; p=0.19) in cases were comparable with controls at baseline, but showed significant thinning at 6 months follow-up (RNFL −83.77±21.06 µm; PMB-30.96±11.02 µm; p<0.0001 for both). Average GC-IPL thickness (cases-29.66±6.86 µm; controls-39.68±2.59 µm) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCL) volume (cases-0.85±0.17 mm 3 ; controls-1.08±0.069 mm 3 ) was significantly less as compared with controls (p<0.0001 for all) at baseline and showed significant further deterioration on follow-up (p<0.001 for all). The average GC-IPL thickness (p value :<0.0001, r:−0.31), GCL volume (p value :<0.000, r:−0.29) and PMB thickness (p value :0.043, r:−0.14) showed a significant negative correlation with final vision at 6 months. Conclusion Progressive structural damage despite visual improvement raises concern about the irreversible nature of EON. PMB, GC-IPL thickness and GCL volume are better predictors of visual recovery in EON.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sachdeva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: