Multinomial logistic regression reveals life insurance preferences in Nepal, suggesting tailored policies for different demographics.
Purpose: This study investigates the socio-demographic, economic, and behavioral determinants of life insurance policy preferences in Nepal. By employing a multinomial logistic regression (MLR) framework, it examines how these factors differentially influence choices among endowment, term, and whole life insurance. Design/methodology/approach: Using primary data from 368 policyholders in Kapilvastu district, Nepal, the study estimates an MLR model grounded in expected utility theory (EUT) and consumer choice behavior. Findings: Age, education, income, and policy duration emerge as pivotal drivers. Endowment policies are preferred by lower-income, less-educated respondents, while term insurance appeals to younger buyers with fewer dependents. High-income individuals favor whole life insurance, reflecting long-term financial planning. Conclusion: The research findings indicated that the elements that influence people’s decisions to purchase an endowment policy rather than whole life insurance. Implications: Insurers should segment markets by socioeconomic profiles and tailor policies to duration-sensitive buyers. Policymakers must enhance financial literacy to bridge demand gaps. Originality/value: This is the first study to empirically validate policy choice determinants in Nepal’s understudied market, offering novel insights into behavioral heterogeneity in emerging economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jnawali et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: