Taking the domain of polar questions in Bosnian/Croatian/Montenegrin/Serbian (BCMS) as the empirical background, the paper probes into the syntax–phonology (CS-PF) interface and discusses insertion and movement as PF-repair strategies mitigating against the lack of convergence at PF. Contra previous accounts, the analysis treats li (lexicalization of Q) as a ‘run-of-the-mill’ 2P clitic in BCMS, whose host cannot always be provided by syntax. I provide evidence against Prosodic Inversion—‘the usual suspect’ for post-syntactic movement in Slavic—thus adding to the body of evidence that Prosodic Inversion does not take place in BCMS. I argue that the PF Movement in such cases has to be raising and adopt Local Dislocation to account for them. Probing into the interaction between Future I and polar questions provides further insights into the ordering of PF Movement operations in BCMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marijana Marelj (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: