This research reveals enhanced color restoration quality in sculptures using DCGAN with dual attention, suggesting better visual outcomes.
To overcome the limitations of low texture accuracy in traditional sculpture color restoration methods, this study proposes an improved Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network (DCGAN) model incorporating a dual attention mechanism (spatial and channel attention) and a channel converter to enhance restoration quality. First, the theoretical foundations of the DCGAN algorithm and its key components (generator, discriminator, etc.) are systematically introduced. Subsequently, a DCGAN-based application model for sculpture color restoration is developed. The generator employs a U-Net architecture integrated with a dual attention module and a channel converter, enhancing both local feature representation and global information capture. Meanwhile, the discriminator utilizes an image region segmentation approach to optimize the assessment of consistency between restored and original regions. The loss function follows a joint optimization strategy, combining perceptual loss, adversarial loss, and structural similarity index (SSIM) loss, ensuring superior restoration performance. In the experiments, mean square error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and SSIM were used as evaluation metrics, and sculpture color restoration tests were conducted on an Intel Xeon workstation. The performance of the proposed model was compared against the traditional DCGAN and other restoration models. The experimental results demonstrate that the improved DCGAN outperforms traditional methods across all evaluation metrics, and compared to traditional DCGAN, the proposed model achieves significantly higher SSIM and PSNR, while reducing MSE. Compared to other restoration models, PSNR and SSIM are further enhanced, MSE is reduced, and the visual consistency between the restored and undamaged areas is significantly improved, with richer texture details.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: