Analysis of cutter ring shape and edge width impacts on rock-breaking force in various rock types, suggesting optimal design features.
Understanding the combined effects of edge width and cutter ring shape on the rock-breaking performance is critical for optimising disc cutter design. The intrusion test serves as an effective approach for investigating the rock-breaking mechanism of disc cutters. In this study, a two-dimensional discrete element method (DEM) model was established to simulate the intrusion process of a single disc cutter. Three commonly used disc cutter types were analysed: disc cutter with flat edge (FEDC), disc cutter with rounded edge (REDC) and disc cutter with alloy tooth (ATDC). The edge widths ranging from 10 mm to 24 mm were examined to assess their influence on rock crack propagation, stress distribution, cutting force and specific cutting energy. The FEDC and REDC exhibited face-contact extrusion breaking, whereas the ATDC was line-contact embedding breaking. The crack extension range, crack number, force chain intensity, stress distribution, rock-breaking force and specific cutting energy ranks are as follows: FEDC > REDC > ATDC. The ATDC generated a higher proportion of tensile cracks compared to the FEDC and REDC, though with fewer long cracks. The rock-breaking efficiency of the FEDC was lower, whereas the REDC and ATDC exhibited higher efficiency. With the increase in edge width, the force chain distribution became more concentrated, leading to greater internal rock damage, and the number and length of cracks increased significantly. Cracks initially expanded laterally at smaller edge widths but extended downward as edge width increased. The peak force and specific cutting energy increased with increasing edge width; the peak force at an edge width of 24 mm is approximately 3.5 times that of an edge width of 10 mm. The REDC is preferable in hard rock formations, and the ATDC is more effective in soft rock formations. The edge width should be determined based on rock properties and thrust capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: