Article uncovers how sexual politics shape climate futures, suggesting queer perspectives may enrich environmental ethics.
Drawing together queer theories and geographies of the future, this article explores how sexual politics condition climate futures. Unlike in geographical research on climate futures, where the future is often realized so that it may be contained and thus governed, queer temporalities are unpredictable and antagonistic, often escaping attempts at capture. Queer theories reorient us then to futures full of risk, chance and uncertainty. They gesture to relations not typically studied in the existing geographical research on climate futures. Focused on these alternative relations, I show that planetary imaginaries are tied up in the policing of intimacies and illustrate that queer environmental ethics extend well beyond attempts to the save the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amy Robson (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: