I here reply to Martin Stokhof and Jaap van der Does’ criticism of my translation of ‘Satz’ as ‘proposition’ in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, arguing that they fail to appreciate the difference between translation and interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Beaney (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: