Molecular dynamics analysis improved cilostazol aerosol delivery in pulmonary fibrosis, suggesting enhanced bioavailability and stability.
Objectives Cilostazol is a BCS class-II antiplatelet drug with a wide range of therapeutic actions, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic properties. Oral administration is associated with poor water solubility, limited absorption, and low bioavailability, which can be overcome by pulmonary administration. Despite of advancements, delivering poorly water-soluble drugs to the lungs with improved solubility, bioavailability, and stability and achieving excellent aerosolization continue to be substantial challenges. Methods In this study, cilostazol was formulated as a dry powder inhaler using cyclodextrin metal–organic framework (CD-MOF), i.e., CLZ-CD-MOF by vapor diffusion method. Molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation confirmed the formation of a cilostazol nanocluster with CD-MOF and its thermodynamic stability. Results The free-energy estimation, hydrogen bond analysis, and the presence of CTAB confirmed the thermodynamic stability of cilostazol-CD-MOF with delta G of − 6.4 ± 2 kcal/mol. Compared with CLZ-I formulation, i.e., micronized cilostazol with a DPI InhaLac®500, the cubic-shaped CLZ-CD-MOFs showed excellent aerodynamic performance owing to porous structure and lower density. The solubility of cilostazol significantly increased over a period of 24 h with the CLZ-CD-MOFs. The dissolution study showed that cilostazol was released more rapidly from CLZ-CD-MOFs than from the CLZ-I formulation, i.e., over 90% release within 15 min. The entrapment efficiency of CLZ-CD-MOF was approximately 96.39%. The CLZ-CD-MOF-F3 showed an EC50 value of 32.70 µg /ml in the A549 cell line, suggesting its potential in acute lung injury and pulmonary fibrosis. Conclusion Therefore, γ-CD-MOF could be a safe and effective approach for delivering cilostazol to the lungs via dry powder inhalation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Misar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: