Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Corpus-based analysis reveals mixed effects of simultaneous interpreting with text on quality, highlighting accuracy and fluency challenges.
Simultaneous interpreting (SI) of read speeches using the speaker’s script in the booth (‘SI with text’) is a common practice, particularly in conferences of the United Nations (UN), but little is known about its effect on the quality of interpreters’ output. The present study investigates material from a corpus of authentic English–Chinese SI at a UN conference to establish whether SI with text is beneficial or detrimental to the quality of the interpretation, assessed for accuracy and completeness based on a graded (minor/major/critical) typology of non-correspondence as well as for target-language form and delivery. The corpus-based comparison between the two interpreting modes shows a ‘mixed’ effect of working with the script, with improvements in accuracy for details, such as names, numbers and terms, but a higher risk of critical information loss and a negative impact on fluency. The implications of these findings for interpreter-mediated multilingual communication in the world’s most important forum for international cooperation are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: