Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals increased bird diversity with artificial light influence in urban areas, suggesting improved management strategies.
Balancing urban nighttime development with biodiversity conservation requires a clear understanding of how artificial light at night (ALAN) affects wildlife over time. However, long-term, fine-scale quantitative assessments remain scarce. Here, we analyzed bird diversity and ALAN in Shanghai from 2000 to 2024 at a 1 km resolution by integrating bird observation records with satellite-derived nighttime light data. We quantified the interaction between bird diversity and ALAN using a coupling coordination degree model (CCDM) and identified key drivers with GeoDetector. Our results show that bird diversity increased in 16% of the study area, though spatially fragmented, while ALAN intensified and expanded outward from the urban core, affecting 4.6% of the area. Areas with moderate or higher coordination (CCD > 0.5) nearly doubled, primarily in urban–suburban transition zones. Urban land use, road density, and vegetation cover (NDVI) were the dominant drivers, with NDVI-related interactions significantly enhancing explanatory power. These findings provide the first long-term, spatially explicit assessment of ALAN–bird diversity interactions in Shanghai, offering quantitative guidance for zoning-based lighting management, green space planning, and biodiversity-friendly urban development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: