Critique of Maslow’s framework reveals limits in education, suggesting PQL+ as a pathway for curriculum transformation.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs once offered educators a clear path: meet basic needs, and motivation will follow. But today’s world complicates that promise. Identity is shaped not just by experience, but by algorithms. Esteem is measured in likes and metrics. Transcendence, once personal and sacred, is now archived in institutional artifacts. The curriculum can no longer climb a simple ladder—it must navigate a spiral of meaning, where agency, ethics, and machine mediation constantly intertwine. While models like Tay and Diener’s offer valuable insights into subjective well-being, they often miss the deeper story: that motivation isn’t just about satisfying needs—it’s about coherence, calling, and the courage to act with purpose. This article critiques the limitations of Maslow’s framework and the recurring gaps in reactive models that reduce human flourishing to fulfillment alone. It proposes a metaphysical reorientation through the Philosophy of Quintuple Learning Plus (PQL+)—not as a replacement, but as a living scaffold for curriculum transformation. PQL+ reframes learning as a vocation rooted in ethical clarity, adaptive imagination, and ontological depth. In doing so, it invites educators to see curriculum not just as a tool, but as a legacy—one that shapes who we become in an age of intelligent transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edgar R. Eslit (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: