Longitudinal study shows remission in 13% of recurrent pericarditis patients treated with anti-IL 1, suggesting therapy simplification is feasible.
Background: Although anti-IL 1 drugs have been proven effective in treating recurrent pericarditis, there is a lack of data about their long-term follow-up.Objectives: To evaluate the percentage of patients with recurrent pericarditis treated with anti-IL 1 who were able to suspend all therapies during follow-up (‘remission’) and/or suspend biologic therapy for at least 6 months (‘improvement’), as well as the duration of illness.Methods: We included all patients currently or previously treated with anti-IL 1 for recurrent pericarditis in follow-up at our pericarditis clinic in Fatebenefratelli-Sacco hospital. Characteristics regarding the first attack, relapses, drug transitions, timing of the last drug suspension and any ongoing treatment at follow-up were recorded.Results: Currently 38 patients were enrolled, with a mean follow up of 5.4 years; 28 of them (74%) are still on treatment with anti-IL 1; 5 (13%) are in remission and free of any treatment since at least 6 months; 5 (13%) obtained improvement: 3 are currently managed only with colchicine, 2 are still in treatment with colchicine and FANS. Mean disease duration in those who reached remission is 5 years (DS±2,3) with mean remission time of 1,7 years (DS±1,2). For those who are still on treatment at follow-up, the mean disease duration was 5.2 years (DS±3,1). Even in patients treated with anti-IL1 drugs, which represent the subgroup of recurrent pericarditis patients with the most complex disease course, suspending or simplifying therapy is possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: