Causal-comparative study finds similar infection rates for infection prevention bundle and traditional antibiotics in cesarean sections, suggesting accessibility benefits.
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of the infection prevention bundle approach with the traditional injectable and oral prolonged antibiotic method to control cesarean section surgical site infection (CS-SSI) in a predominantly unbooked and low-income population. Methods: A prospective causal comparative study in a tertiary care hospital. One hundred and eighty-four pregnant women planned for cesarean sections, with no recent infection, were chosen by simple random sampling method and divided into two groups. Group A patients (92) were managed by an infection prevention bundle that consisted of pre-operative bathing, a single dose of injectable cephalexin (1-2 grams) intravenously within one hour of incision, and spontaneous removal of the placenta. Group C patients (92) were managed by the traditional method, which is injection of ceftriaxone (1-2 grams) intravenously for 48 hours, followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days. Results:The infection rate in group A was 2.2% versus 1.1% in group C patients, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (pp value: 0.259). A significant difference is observed in pre-op Hb levels (p-value = 0.003), with <9 gm/dl being 4 (4.3%) in Group A and 9 (9.8%) in Group C, 9-11 gm/dl being 69 (75%) in Group A and 47 (51.1%) in Group C, and >11 gm/dl being 19 (20.7%) in Group A and 36 (39.1%) in Group C. Pre-operative total leucocyte count, anesthesia type, duration of C-section, complications, and blood loss show no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: The infection prevention bundle approach is simple, cheap, applicable, and effective in controlling cesarean section surgical site infection in low income populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toheed et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: