Observational analysis shows reliable antibody detection in vaccinated individuals, indicating both assays' utility.
Background: Public health has been greatly damaged by the worldwide Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, which was brought on by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Strong diagnostic instruments are now required in order to precisely identify and track immunity due to the pandemic. Objective: This study aimed to compare the performance of two serological assays in detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in vaccinated individuals. Methods: From August 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024, a cross-sectional study was carried out at the Dow International Medical College in Karachi, in the Section of Chemical Pathology. Analysis was done on a convenience sample of 187 laboratory employees that was non-probability. Siemens Healthineers Atellica® IM SARS-CoV-2 IgG and ROCHE Elecsys® were used to evaluate blood samples. Software for SPSS and R was used to conduct statistical studies, which included Bland-Altman plots, bivariate regression analysis, descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Passing-Bablok regression. There was a significance threshold of p < 0.05 Results: Among all participants, 48.7% and 51.3% were tested reactive for Siemens, and Roche, respectively. Bivariate regression analyses showed weak correlations for age, gender, Covid-19 status, and vaccination status with both assays. The Bland-Altman plot demonstrated good concordance (red line at 0) between Siemens and Roche assays, though a few outliers were noted. Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed a proportional relationship with Roche values generally higher than Siemens, but with moderate correlation. Conclusion: Both Siemens and Roche assays are reliable for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, with Roche showing slightly higher values. The findings highlight the utility of serological testing in complementing molecular diagnostics and monitoring immune responses in vaccinated individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamali et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: