Researchers are currently developing neural implants, specifically brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), to help people move, communicate, and think. BCIs work by recording neural activity through a surgically implanted device, and then transferring that information to a computer that can react to help the person perform a specific ability, such as typing words thought by the implantee. BCIs have several potential applications in the medical field and in the field of human enhancement, but there is not a significant body of research regarding how people view the different uses. This study aimed to figure out what kinds of BCI uses are socially acceptable, and if any age groups are significantly more or less trusting of certain uses. The data was collected through a digital survey and in the end, there were 37 responses. The results showed that the tested population was generally accepting of BCIs when they are used to treat physical conditions, but not supportive of BCIs used to treat mental conditions or enhance human capabilities. Additionally, there was no correlation between age and views on BCIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGovern et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: