Observational analysis found 98.4% sero-protection rate in students following delayed hepatitis B vaccination, suggesting timing alterations may not significantly impact efficacy.
Introduction: Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) is safe and very effective in preventing HBV infection and its complications. The currently available HBV vaccine preparations use recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as the antigen. Large vaccination studies suggested non-responder rates in the range of 5–10%. This study aims to estimate the difference in non-response rate after delayed doses of Hepatitis B vaccination in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A total of 250 students enrolled during the academic year 2020–21 were selected for the study. The study participants were tested for anti-HBs-IgG titers one–two months post the third dose of vaccine by electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay method and the vaccination response were documented. Results: The 246 (98.4%) participants had anti-HBs titers >100 IU/L (range 2444–3612 IU/L) with a median titer of 2826 IU/L; and 4 (1.6%) participants had titers between 10 and 99 IU/L (low responders). There were none who had antibody titers <10 IU/L (non-responders). Discussion: It was found that the vast majority (98.4%) of the study participants who received a delayed third dose of HBV vaccine developed good sero-protection against HBV infection and the low responder rate was 1.6%. In our cohort, intervals up to 18 months (1.5 years) between the first and third dose were not associated with a decline in the sero-protection rate. Conclusion: The response to Hepatitis B vaccine is not highly dependent on the timing of vaccine doses and modest alterations in the timing of doses do not affect the excellent response to this vaccine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yazhini Karuppiah (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: