Multicenter study evaluates booster immunity in students, indicating strong response and high susceptibility.
Background: Since China incorporated the hepatitis B vaccine into its Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) in 2002, the first cohort of infants to receive the full vaccination series has now reached college age. As vaccine-induced antibodies gradually wane, this cohort faces a higher risk of infection. Therefore, we assessed their current seroprotection status and evaluated the immunogenicity and short-term antibody kinetics of a single 60 μg booster dose in susceptible individuals, while also constructing a model of expected duration of protection. Methods: In a multicenter study across three Anhui universities, 2988 students were screened for HBV markers. Among them, 160 who tested negative for all five markers received a single 60 μg booster. Antibody titers were monitored for 1–5 months. Results: Serological screening showed 0.33% HBsAg positivity, 36.28% anti-HBs positivity, and 63.02% negativity for all markers, indicating high susceptibility. After the booster, seroprotection rate (SPR) remained >85% throughout follow-up, and anti-HBs geometric mean concentration (GMC) peaked at 1–2 months. Stratified analysis based on immune response status revealed that the proportion of high responders (≥100 mIU/mL) peaked early and then gradually declined, whereas the proportion of low responders (10–99.99 mIU/mL) increased over the follow-up period. A linear mixed-effects model predicted that protective levels (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) would persist for an average of 32.8 months. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of university students lack protective immunity against hepatitis B. A single 60 μg booster rapidly and effectively induced protection, demonstrating strong immunogenicity. These findings support implementing efficient booster strategies in university settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: