Analysis uncovers the Skills-Mobility Paradox in low-skilled employment, implying that education alone may not ensure upward mobility.
Nearly half of young Vietnamese workers remain trapped in low-skilled employment despite education investments, contradicting human capital theory’s prediction that skills enable upward mobility. We develop the “Skills-Mobility Paradox” theory explaining this puzzle through three mechanisms: institutional recognition gaps, mobility thresholds, and sectoral skill traps. Using Vietnam Labor Force Survey data (2010–2023) and sectoral case studies, we find threshold effects at 200 training hours, 40–60% recognition gaps for vocational credentials, and negative mobility returns to sector-specific experience (−2.3% annually). These patterns cannot be explained by existing human capital or segmentation theories. Our framework reveals that in segmented labor markets, the skills-mobility relationship is institutionally mediated rather than inherent. This challenges human capital theory’s foundational assumptions and explains why education expansion fails to reduce inequality and why skills-focused interventions alone may be insufficient for promoting mobility in developing economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
La et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: