This framework integrates data-driven modeling and multi-objective optimization, showing enhanced core loss performance and energy transmission.
Magnetic components serve as critical energy conversion elements in power conversion systems, with their performance directly determining overall system efficiency and long-term operational reliability. The development of accurate core loss frameworks and multi-objective optimization strategies has emerged as a pivotal technical bottleneck in power electronics research. This study develops an integrated framework combining physics-informed modeling and multi-objective optimization. Key findings include the following: (1) a square-root temperature correction model (exponent = 0.5) derived via nonlinear least squares outperforms six alternatives for Steinmetz equation enhancement; (2) a hybrid Bi-LSTM-Bayes-ISE model achieves industry-leading predictive accuracy (R2 = 96.22%) through Bayesian hyperparameter optimization; and (3) coupled with NSGA-II, the framework optimizes core loss minimization and magnetic energy transmission, yielding Pareto-optimal solutions. Eight decision-making strategies are compared to refine trade-offs, while a crow search algorithm (CSA) improves NSGA-II’s initial population diversity. UFM, as the optimal decision strategy, achieves minimal core loss (659,555 W/m3) and maximal energy transmission (41,201.9 T·Hz) under 90 °C, 489.7 kHz, and 0.0841 T conditions. Experimental results validate the approach’s superiority in balancing performance and multi-objective efficiency under thermal variations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: