Analysis of curatorial empathy in museums reflects societal needs during crisis, suggesting new approaches to engagement.
This article analyzes responses of museums and art institutions in Israel to the events of October 7th. It stresses the public role of museums in times of crisis, and the ways that diverse curatorial choices reflect upon their institutions’ pursuits. It focuses on the case study of curatorial empathy, enacted at the Tel Aviv University Art Gallery, noting its aptness at times of crisis and trauma. The article claims that in a society that experiences both internal and external conflicts, the approach of empathy offers flexibility and openness that allow the museum to respond to public need on the one hand, and poses challenging questions on the other. Such questions are explored through the method of artistic-scientific dialogue. As contentions multiply, overlap, and contrast, the expansion of circles of identification becomes a key strategy in addressing this crisis. This essay argues that empathy is a more thoughtful and productive curatorial approach, because it emphasizes connection rather than only identity. From this perspective, the crisis that started on October 7th is not only that of war, loss, and grief, but also that of a threat to humanness under extreme angst.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamar Mayer (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: