Retrospective study found poor compliance with BSG guidelines in managing acute gastrointestinal bleeding, suggesting a need for improved documentation and follow-up.
Aim Acute severe gastrointestinal bleeding is a major cause of mortality, with fatality rates of 10% for upper GI bleeding (UGIB) and 3% for lower GI bleeding (LGIB). The Oakland score, with cutoff of ≤8, identifies low-risk patients suitable for discharge. This study aims to assess compliance with British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines in managing ALGIB. Methods A retrospective single-centre study included 79 adult ALGIB patients managed by general surgery between September 1 and October 31, 2024. Data were retrieved from electronic records and analyzed using Excel and SPSS. Results The mean age was 65 years (range 28–97 years) with a 1:1 male-to-female ratio. Causes included haemorrhoids (21.5%), diverticular disease (17.7%), inflammatory bowel disease (13.9%), malignancy (10.1%) and others (radiation proctitis and infective colitis). Shock index and Oakland score documentation were 0% and 10%, respectively. Of seven CT angiograms, 43% were positive. The mean Oakland score was 16 (range 5–32), correlating with hospital stay and transfusion need. Four patients with an Oakland score ≤8 and 31 with scores >8 were discharged. Blood transfusion was required in 21% cases. Of six patients receiving tranexamic acid (TXA), three required transfusion, two had endoscopic intervention, one underwent embolisation, and one required surgery. Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 43%. No 30-day mortality or readmissions reported. Conclusion Management of ALGIB showed poor adherence to BSG guidelines, including inadequate documentation, inappropriate discharges, and low follow-up colonoscopy rates. TXA use was limited, with mixed outcomes. Improvements in guideline compliance are needed to enhance care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nair et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: