Qualitative study investigates ethical dilemmas faced by hospital ethics committees, suggesting improvements may enhance ethical decision-making.
Abstract Background Hospital Ethics Committees (HECs) aim to address complex ethical dilemmas and provide ethical counselling and guidance in hospital and clinical setting. Despite their formal and legalistic authority in Israel, little is known about their actual practices, structure and perceived role by their members. Methods This qualitative study employed Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to explore the lived experiences of HEC members in Israeli hospitals and the meaning they attach to their roles. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with committee chairs and members with diverse professional and institutional backgrounds in nine hospitals throughout the country. Data were analyzed using thematic coding to identify key patterns and insights. Results Five major themes emerged: (1 Perception of committee role; (2) Committee composition, member characteristics and ethics training; (3) Common ethical issues discussed in the Ethics Committee; (4) Committee’s manner of operation; and (5) Committee’s relationships with various entities, and the limitations of its operation. Conclusions HECs in Israel serve a unique dual role as legal and ethical decision-making bodies. While they support clinicians and, to some extent, patients, their potential is hindered by systemic gaps in training, collaboration and engagement. Further research is recommended to explore patient experiences and evaluate committee effectiveness in advancing ethical clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sperling et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: