Retrospective case-control study identifies Hounsfield unit values as an independent predictor of nonunion, suggesting assessment can enhance preoperative evaluation.
Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Objective: To evaluate whether L1 vertebral body Hounsfield unit (HU) values measured on preoperative computed tomography (CT) can predict nonunion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Background: HU values have been associated with bone condition and implant-related complications in spine surgery. However, their predictive value for bony nonunion after PLIF remains unclear. Materials and Methods: Patients aged older than 60 years who underwent single-level PLIF with preoperative CT and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were included. Patients were divided into union and nonunion groups based on one-year postoperative CT and dynamic radiographs. Variables analyzed included demographic and clinical factors, lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores, L1-HU value, and osteoporosis diagnosis. Multivariable Firth logistic regression identified predictors of nonunion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the L1-HU threshold. The correlation between the L1-HU value and the lumbar spine BMD T-score was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and linear regression. Results: Among the 79 patients, 66 met the inclusion criteria (mean age, 74.3 yr). At one year, 17 (25.8%) had nonunion. Multivariable Firth logistic regression identified the L1-HU value as the only significant independent predictor of nonunion ( P = 0.0047; odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–0.99). ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.79 with a cutoff of 99.0 HU. Although the mean lumbar spine BMD T-score of all patients was within the normal range, the corresponding average L1-HU value was within the osteoporotic range. The L1-HU value showed a moderate correlation with lumbar spine BMD T-score (r = 0.55). Conclusions: The preoperative L1-HU value was the only independent predictor of nonunion after PLIF. The CT-based HU assessment can be a practical tool for preoperative evaluation and risk stratification in patients undergoing PLIF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitaguchi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: