Cohort study associates specific genetic variants with increased cardiometabolic risk in obese women, implying targeted interventions may be beneficial.
Background/Objectives: The location and distribution of excess fat, rather than overall adiposity, are stronger predictors of cardiometabolic risk and are commonly assessed using the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Fat distribution in women has a heritable component, yet the genetic factors that influence it remain poorly understood. We aim to assess the association between obesity-related polymorphisms with WHR and cardiometabolic risk in overweight and obese women. Methods: A cohort study was conducted in 512 women (56.1 ± 6.4 years; body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2). WHR was calculated, and participants were classified into android (WHR > 0.85) or gynoid (WHR ≤ 0.85) obesity groups. We genotyped 15 SNPs previously associated with obesity using TaqMan real-time PCR. Different genetic models (dominant, recessive, and allelic) were analysed, and bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the fat distribution groups. Results: Of the 15 SNPs studied, only 3 presented a significant association with WHR > 0.85. PSRC1 rs599839 in a dominant model (AA + GA vs. GG) with OR = 3.18 (p = 0.041), SLC30A8 rs1326634 in a recessive model (CC vs. TC + TT) (OR = 2.38; p = 0.004), both showing increased susceptibility to central obesity. KIF6 rs20455 offers protection in a recessive model (CC vs. TC + TT) with an OR of 0.47 (p = 0.043). After adjusted multivariate analysis, only SLC30A8 and diabetes remained independently associated with an increased risk of android obesity (OR = 2.50; p = 0.003 and OR = 3.63; p = 0.004, respectively). Conclusions: The SLC30A8 variant was significantly associated with android fat distribution and high cardiometabolic risk in overweight/obese women. Identifying genetic factors that influence fat distribution may help specify targeted lifestyle changes or pharmacological interventions to reduce risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sá et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: