Analysis reveals inter-ply friction and bending impact deformation in uncured polymers, suggesting optimized clamping force enhances performance.
Pre-stacked uncured metal–fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates, which are critical for aerospace components like double-curved fuselage panels, wing ribs, and engine nacelles, exhibit better deformation behavior than their fully cured counterparts. However, accurate process simulation requires precise material characterization and process optimization to achieve a defect-free structural design. This study focuses on two core material behaviors of uncured laminates—inter-ply friction at metal–prepreg interfaces and out-of-plane bending—and optimizes process parameters for their non-coherent deformation. Experimental tests included double-lap sliding tests (to quantify inter-ply friction) and clamped-beam bending tests (to characterize out-of-plane bending); a double-curved dome part was designed to assess the effects of the material constituent, fiber orientation, inter-ply friction, and clamping force, with validation via finite element modeling (FEM) in Abaqus software. The results indicate that the static–kinetic friction model effectively predicts inter-ply friction behavior, with numerical friction coefficient–displacement trends closely matching experimental data. Additionally, the flexural bending model showed that greater plastic deformation in metal layers increased bending force while reducing post-unloading spring-back depth. Furthermore, for non-coherent deformation, higher clamping forces improve FRP prepreg deformation and mitigate buckling, but excessive plastic deformation raises metal cracking risk. This work helps establish a combined experimental–numerical framework for the defect prediction and process optimization of complex lightweight components, which address the core needs of modern aerospace manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: