Observational analysis identifies small variants in SMN1 among individuals with spinal muscular atrophy, suggesting expedited treatment initiation.
Spinal muscular atrophy 5q (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by recessive pathogenic variants in the SMN1 gene, which encodes the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. While the majority of patients with SMA exhibit homozygous deletions in SMN1, a minority (2%-5%) of patients with SMA harbor an SMN1 deletion plus a single nucleotide variant on the second allele, which can be identified through direct gene sequencing. The comprehensive characterization of patients with SMA is increasingly crucial considering emerging therapies and newborn screening initiatives. Over the past 20 years, we confirmed a molecular diagnosis of SMA in 149 patients consisting of 138 postnatal and 11 prenatal cases, through a quantitative molecular approach (real-time PCR and/or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) associated with direct sequencing. We identified homozygous SMN1 deletions in 142 probands (95%). The remaining 7 patients (5%) displayed heterozygous SMN1 deletion in compound with a different molecular defect. Notably, 1 patient presented with an intronic variant necessitating mRNA transcript analysis, a process that extended the time to diagnosis. The identification of small pathogenic variants in patients with SMA is of paramount importance for enhancing diagnosis and prognosis, deciphering response variations to existing treatments, and designing novel therapies tailored to address these genetic variants. We propose a paradigm shift from current guidelines, particularly for patients with a heterozygous SMN1 deletion and a clinically compatible SMA phenotype, especially when reduced SMN transcript levels are evident. In such cases, expedited therapy initiation, including reversible treatments like nusinersen or risdiplam, is recommended without waiting for the completion of the molecular testing, thus minimizing delays in crucial therapeutic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rimoldi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: