What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study.

How Are Qualitative Methods Used in Implementation Science Research? Results From a Systematic Scoping Review

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Scoping review reveals qualitative methods optimize evidence-based interventions in implementation science, highlighting innovation and gaps.

Qualitative methods provide in-depth understanding of implementation science outcomes, optimizing evidence-based interventions.
A total of 867 articles were analyzed, with in-depth interviews used in 84.3% of studies to gather data on implementation issues.
The systematic scoping review identified thematic analysis as the most common analytic method, employed in 45.3% of studies.
Significant variation was found in how qualitative methods are applied, indicating areas for improvement in implementation science research.

Hagaman et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Scoping review reveals qualitative methods optimize evidence-based interventions in implementation science, highlighting innovation and gaps.

Qualitative methods provide in-depth understanding of implementation science outcomes, optimizing evidence-based interventions.
A total of 867 articles were analyzed, with in-depth interviews used in 84.3% of studies to gather data on implementation issues.
The systematic scoping review identified thematic analysis as the most common analytic method, employed in 45.3% of studies.
Significant variation was found in how qualitative methods are applied, indicating areas for improvement in implementation science research.

Hagaman et al. (2025) studied this question.

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark