This methodology demonstrates 100% accuracy for datasets, highlighting improved feature extraction and classification performance.
This paper proposes a rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on HFMD and a dual-branch parallel network, aiming to address the issue of diagnostic accuracy being compromised by the disparity in data quality across different source domains due to sparse feature separation in rolling bearing acoustic signals. Traditional methods face challenges in feature extraction, sensitivity to noise, and difficulties in handling coupled multi-fault conditions in rolling bearing fault diagnosis. To overcome these challenges, this study first employs the HawkFish Optimization Algorithm to optimize Feature Mode Decomposition (HFMD) parameters, thereby improving modal decomposition accuracy. The optimal modal components are selected based on the minimum Residual Energy Index (REI) criterion, with their time-domain graphs and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) time-frequency diagrams extracted as network inputs. Then, a dual-branch parallel network model is constructed, where the multi-scale residual structure (Res2Net) incorporating the Efficient Channel Attention (ECA) mechanism serves as the temporal branch to extract key features and suppress noise interference, while the Swin Transformer integrating multi-stage cross-scale attention (MSCSA) acts as the time-frequency branch to break through local perception bottlenecks and enhance classification performance under limited resources. Finally, the time-domain graphs and time-frequency graphs are, respectively, input into Res2Net and Swin Transformer, and the features from both branches are fused through a fully connected layer to obtain comprehensive fault diagnosis results. The research results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves 100% accuracy in open-source datasets. In the experimental data, the diagnostic accuracy of this study demonstrates significant advantages over other diagnostic models, achieving an accuracy rate of 98.5%. Under few-shot conditions, this study maintains an accuracy rate no lower than 95%, with only a 2.34% variation in accuracy. HFMD and the dual-branch parallel network exhibit remarkable stability and superiority in the field of rolling bearing fault diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: