Retrospective analysis shows 8 mg aflibercept improves visual outcomes in treatment-naïve patients, suggesting efficacy variations based on treatment history.
Background/Objectives: The relative efficacy of 8 mg aflibercept compared to 2 mg in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) has not been fully established. This study aims to compare the visual and anatomical outcomes of aflibercept 8 mg versus 2 mg in patients with nAMD in both treatment-naïve individuals with no history of anti-VEGF treatment and those previously treated with intravitreal injections. Methods: This retrospective study included 13 eyes treated with aflibercept 8 mg and 14 eyes with aflibercept 2 mg in treatment-naïve patients, along with 15 eyes switched to aflibercept 8 mg previously treated with other intravitreal injections and 15 eyes continued on aflibercept 2 mg in patients. Baseline and one-month post-injection changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were assessed. Results: In treatment-naïve patients, the aflibercept 8 mg group showed a significant improvement in BCVA (logMAR 0.19 ± 0.23 to 0.13 ± 0.20, p = 0.0156), while the 2 mg group did not. Both doses reduced CMT significantly, with a greater reduction in the 8 mg group (dCMT 28.60% vs. 24.08%, p = 0.0220). In previously treated patients, no significant changes in BCVA were noted in either group; however, both groups showed significant reductions in CMT. Conclusions: Real-world data demonstrated that aflibercept 8 mg led to substantial improvements in anatomical outcomes one month after injection, irrespective of previous intravitreal injection history. However, significant improvements in visual outcomes were observed exclusively in treatment-naïve patients. Further large-scale, long-term studies are required to determine the proportion of patients who experience improvement and to assess whether these improvements are maintained over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizukami et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: