This analysis integrates HEFT operators and quantifies momentum-dependent impacts on di-Higgs kinematics, suggesting enhanced sensitivity in exclusion limits.
We present a momentum-dependent reweighting strategy to extend current LHC di-Higgs analyses within the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>κ</a:mi></a:math> framework and Standard Model effective field theory into the bosonic sector of the Higgs effective field theory (HEFT). Unlike Standard Model effective field theory, where symmetry constraints tightly correlated multi-Higgs processes, HEFT allows for a broader range of momentum-dependent deviations that can substantially impact di-Higgs kinematics and offer a powerful probe of nonlinear Higgs dynamics. We generalize the interpretation of existing experimental analyses by integrating HEFT operators up to chiral dimension 4 into differential Monte Carlo reweighting. We quantify the sensitivity to representative HEFT operators using multidimensional likelihoods for Run 3 and project the reach at the high-luminosity LHC. Particular emphasis is placed on how different exclusive final states, such as <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>b</c:mi><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi>b</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">¯</c:mo></c:mover><c:mi>b</c:mi><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi>b</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">¯</c:mo></c:mover></c:math> and <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>b</i:mi><i:mover accent="true"><i:mi>b</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">¯</i:mo></i:mover><i:mi>γ</i:mi><i:mi>γ</i:mi></i:math>, respond to momentum enhancements and how their complementary event selections drive exclusion limits. We further explore how rare final states, especially four-top production, can provide orthogonal constraints on HEFT-induced modifications, thereby enhancing global sensitivity to new physics effects in the Higgs sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Englert et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: