Prospective cohort study reveals dietary adherence impacts all-cause mortality in diabetes subgroups, suggesting diet management may improve outcomes.
Objective: To investigate the association between adherence to a plant-based dietary index (PDI), healthy-PDI and unhealthy-PDI with all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes and to assess whether associations varied by diabetes subgroups. Research design and methods: We included 4,829 UK Biobank participants with type 2 diabetes and at least two 24-hour dietary recalls. We generated overall-PDI, healthy-PDI and unhealthy-PDI scores. Multivariable Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality, comparing the highest (T3) with the lowest tertile (T1) of adherence to PDI, healthy-PDI, and unhealthy-PDI. Interactions between PDI adherence and diabetes subgroups (age at diagnosis, HbA1c, waist circumference) were assessed by two-dimensional B-splines and by including product terms into the model. Results: During a mean follow-up of 11.3 years, 679 deaths occurred. Individuals with highest adherence to PDI, compared to those with lowest adherence, were at lower risk of all-cause mortality (T3 vs T1; HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.63; 0.99)) and similar direction was observed for healthy-PDI (0.82 (0.67; 1.02)), however the 95% CI included the null value. Unhealthy-PDI was associated with increased mortality risk (1.24 (1.00, 1.54)). The associations between PDI, healthy-PDI and unhealthy-PDI with all-cause mortality risk were more pronounced for those with poorer glycaemic control, higher waist circumference, diagnosed earlier in life, and with longer diabetes duration. Conclusions: Higher PDI adherence was associated with decreased, while higher unhealthy-PDI adherence with an increased mortality risk. There was an indication for differences in these association depending on diabetes subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szczerba et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: