Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals how narratives affect policy investments in pensions and education, suggesting that shifting expectations can drive reform.
How can we explain decisions by governments to engage in policy investments—accepting short‐term costs in return for anticipated gains in the longer term—after previously sustaining the status quo? Our article examines the role of narratives in changing expectations about the future as a key driver of intertemporal policymaking. In light of an uncertain future, governments make policy decisions that rely on expectations regarding the anticipated consequences of different policy options. We propose that new narratives about the future can shift expectations regarding the anticipated costs and benefits of policy investments; in turn, prompting policy reform. To empirically substantiate this argument, we present findings from two case studies of major reforms in the UK regarding pensions and education policy. Both cases show how shifting narratives about the future can trigger policy change; even in a context where the relative influence of organized interests and institutions remains stable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuytens et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: