⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

June 27, 2025Cahiers du Centre de Linguistique et des Sciences du Langage

Exploring oppositions in morphology

John Goldsmith Marina Ermolaeva

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This analysis offers a method to identify morphs and allomorphy in morphological paradigms.
First order differences reveal morphs, while second order differences highlight allomorphy in words.
Identifying allomorphy at morpheme boundaries demonstrates its relevance to morphophonology.
Applying group structure to strings provides a framework for exploring morphological variations.

Implication

This analysis identifies allomorphy and morphophonemics in words, implying a new method for studying morphology.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Goldsmith et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3ef72b87ece8dc957869 https://doi.org/10.26034/la.cdclsl.2025.8345

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Opaque morphology and phonology: Historical prefixes in English2024 · 8 citations
2Morphological processing in written word recognition2025 · 1 citations
3The meaning of morphomes: distributional semantics of Spanish stem alternations2024 · 6 citations
4Breaking down prefixed words is unaffected by morphological boundary opacity: Evidence from behavioral and MEG experiments2025 · 1 citations
5Non-concatenative morphological domains constrain phonotactics: a case study of Egyptian Arabic2025