Research and development improved critical thinking skills in acid-base among students, indicating effectiveness and practicality.
This study is conducted in response to the low levels of students’ critical thinking skills, particularly in interpretation, analysis, inference, and explanation, in the context of acid-base chemistry, as well as the scarcity of digital resources that promote active learning. The objective is to develop a problem-solving-based E-Student Liveworksheet to improve critical thinking skills related to acid-base material. Research and Development (R&D) was employed, following the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate). The feasibility of the developed worksheet was evaluated using Nieveen’s criteria: validity, practicality, and effectiveness. Data were gathered through expert validation forms, student questionnaires, classroom observations, and critical thinking tests. The study involved eleventh-grade students at Gedangan Senior High School. Validation results showed a mode score of 4, indicating high content validity. The practicality score from student responses reached 95%, categorized as "very good." Effectiveness was demonstrated by n-gain scores ranging from 0.50 to 1.00, reflecting moderate to high improvement across all critical thinking indicators. These findings confirm that the liveworksheet is a valid, practical, and effective tool for enhancing students’ critical thinking in acid-base learning. In conclusion, the developed digital resource supports the goals of the Independent Curriculum by fostering interactive, contextual, and problem-based learning. This innovation offers valuable potential for broader application in science education and serves as a reference for integrating technology to promote higher-order thinking. Future research is recommended to explore its long-term impact and adaptability across various scientific topics and learning environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutiara et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: