Cross-sectional analysis reveals TG/HDL-C outperforms other lipid ratios for identifying metabolic syndrome, suggesting metabolic dysregulation insights.
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), especially in Middle Eastern populations with a high metabolic burden. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive utility of different lipid ratios, including triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C)/HDL-C, and non-HDL-C/HDL-C, for identifying MetS. In addition, we aimed to characterise the underlying metabolic dysregulation using the most predictive lipid ratio by comparing metabolomic profiles between high-risk (T3) and low-risk (T1) groups. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 2179 Qatari adults without CVD and/or T2DM. The predictive value of each lipid ratio for MetS was compared. Untargeted metabolomics was performed to profile metabolic changes between T3 and T1. Results: After adjustment for age, sex, and BMI, TG/HDL-C showed the highest discriminative ability for MetS (AUC = 0.896, 95% CI: 0.88–0.91; OR = 4.36, 95% CI: 3.63–5.28, p < 0.0001). In pairwise AUC comparisons, TG/HDL-C outperformed LDL-C/HDL-C (p = 2.6 × 10−4, after correction for multiple comparisons), with no significant differences versus other ratios. The high-risk group exhibited raised levels of phosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylinositols, and diacylglycerols, and lower levels of sphingomyelins and plasmalogens. These lipid classes have been suggested to be implicated in insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction. Elevated monoacylglycerols were identified in high-TG/HDL-C groups, representing a previously underreported pattern. Conclusions: The TG/HDL-C ratio showed a better association with MetS compared with other lipid ratios and was linked to distinct metabolomic signatures. These findings suggest potential value for early risk evaluation, but longitudinal and mechanistic studies are needed to confirm clinical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: