Experimental investigation shows size significantly affects compressive strength in bamboo, highlighting the role of strain rate.
The combined influence of specimen size and strain rate on the mechanical behaviour of small-diameter bamboo culms remains insufficiently characterised. This study investigates the longitudinal compressive strength of Chimonobambusa utilis through axial compression tests on specimens measuring 15 × 15 × 5 mm, 18 × 18 × 6 mm, and 21 × 21 × 7 mm under strain rates of 10−4, 10−3, and 10−2 s−1. Coupling experimental data with theoretical analysis, this study develops a size–strain rate interaction model to quantitatively assess the effects of specimen size and strain rate on the compressive strength of small-diameter bamboo. Increasing specimen size reduced strength and shifted failure modes from shear to buckling and splitting. At a strain rate of 10−4 s−1, strength decreased from 73.35 MPa for the 15 × 15 × 5 mm specimens to 62.84 MPa for the 21 × 21 × 7 mm specimens. Conversely, increasing the strain rate from 10−4 s−1 to 10−2 s−1 for the 15 × 15 × 5 mm specimens increased strength from 73.35 MPa to 80.27 MPa, indicating suppressed crack propagation. The Type II Weibull model exhibited higher predictive accuracy and parameter stability than the Type I variant. Coupling the Type II Weibull function with a power-law strain rate term and an interaction exponent developed a predictive equation, achieving relative errors below 5%. The findings demonstrate that specimen size predominantly governs strength, whereas strain rate exerts a secondary but enhancing influence. The proposed coupling model enables reliable axial load prediction for small-diameter bamboo culms, supporting material selection and dimensional optimisation in structural applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: