Functional near-infrared spectroscopy reveals increased oxy-Hb levels with mirror visual feedback and stimulation, indicating enhanced cortical engagement.
Background/Objectives: Mirror visual feedback (MVF) can facilitate post-stroke upper limb recovery. Pairing MVF with electromyography-triggered electrical stimulation (ES) may enhance afferent input and sensorimotor engagement. As aging alters neurovascular responses, we aimed to test MVF and MVF + ES in older adults using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Methods: Seventeen right-handed adults performed left wrist flexion under three visual conditions—circle fixation (CT), viewing the right hand (RT), and mirror viewing (MT)—each with/without ES to right wrist flexors synchronized to left forearm electromy-ography (EMG). Oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) was recorded over the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), precentral gyrus (PrG), postcentral gyrus (PoG), supramarginal gyrus (SMG), superior parietal lobule (SPL), and supplementary motor area. A 2 × 3 repeat-ed-measures analysis of variance (ES × visual), with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests, assessed effects. The left forearm EMG verified comparable efforts. Results: ES increased oxy-Hb levels in the left IFG, PrG, PoG, and SMG, with a significant ES × visual interaction in the left IFG. Post hoc tests revealed the following: MT + ES > MT (left IFG), RT + ES > RT (left PoG, SMG), and CT + ES > CT (left PoG, PrG, SMG, SPL). The right IFG/PrG ratio was higher for CT + ES than for CT. The left EMG did not differ. Conclusions: In older adults, MVF + EMG-triggered ES augments left-lateralized frontopa-rietal/sensorimotor activation beyond MVF alone, with augmentation topography de-pending on the visual context. These findings support neurophysiological plausibility and warrant dose–response and behavioral transfer studies in stroke cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inagaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: