Posthoc analysis characterizes insulin use and glycaemic levels across hospital shifts, revealing the benefits of continuous glucose monitoring.
Objective To characterise glucose levels and insulin use daily and during hospital shifts throughout hospitalisation which might inform treatment planning and improve outcomes. Methods This is a posthoc analysis from a two-centre randomised trial with 166 non-intensive care unit hospitalised patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes management was performed by regular staff, guided by diabetes teams using insulin titration algorithms based on either point-of-care glucose testing (POC-arm) or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM-arm). POC-arm participants wore blinded CGMs. The primary outcome was the development in time in range (TIR) (3.9–10.0 mmol/l) between arms during hospitalisation. Results TIR improved progressively to nearly 90% in the CGM-arm by discharge, compared to 60% in the POC-arm, which plateaued after day 5 (p<.001). Both arms showed the lowest TIR and highest insulin use during the day shift (07:00–15:00 h). Correctional insulin doses were lower in the CGM-arm compared to the POC-arm across all shifts: 0.7 IU (±0.3) lower during day shifts (p=.016), 1.2 IU (±0.4) lower during evening shifts (15:01–23:00 h, p=.005), and 0.3 IU (±0.1) lower during night shifts (23:01–06:59 h, p=.038). Prandial insulin doses were 1.1 IU (±0.5) lower during evening shifts in the CGM-arm (p=.021). Conclusions TIR improved to nearly 90% in the CGM-arm by discharge, compared to 60% in the POC-arm, which plateaued after day 5, despite lower daily insulin doses in the CGM-arm. These findings underscore the sustained effectiveness of CGM in enhancing glycaemic levels throughout the entire duration of hospitalisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: