Systematic review shows important neurofeedback training parameters impact neural modulation, highlighting the neurofeedback inefficacy problem.
Introduction Real-time neurofeedback is an emerging method for regional modulation of neural activity with physiological and behavioral effects that persist beyond the duration of feedback sessions. However, many individuals fail to achieve successful modulation, a challenge known as the “neurofeedback inefficacy problem.” This study examined how methodological parameters of neurofeedback training influence the acquisition and retention of neural modulation in healthy adults. Methods A systematic search identified eligible studies, resulting in 55 participant groups included in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were calculated for changes in neural activity from first to last session and from pre- to post-training. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess the impact of discrete and continuous moderators. Results This meta-analysis identified four parameters associated with significant neural modulation in the desired direction: the neurofeedback imaging device used, complexity of the feedback stimulus, presence of a pre-training rehearsal trial, and EEG target oscillations. Discussion This meta-analysis highlights key methodological factors that shape neurofeedback efficacy in non-clinical populations. Findings may serve to better understand how methodological variables used in neurofeedback influence the acquisition and retention of neural modulation. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022357160 , identifier: CRD42022357160.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: