Key result
Network-based fMRI neurofeedback training maintained participants' ability to self-regulate brain activity at 2 months, but initial improvements in sustained attention returned to baseline.
Why the study?
Long-term learning effects of functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback training remain under-explored.
Does network-based fMRI neurofeedback training produce long-term improvements in sustained attention and brain network regulation in healthy participants?
Does network-based fMRI neurofeedback training produce long-term improvements in sustained attention and brain network regulation in healthy participants?
fMRI neurofeedback training induces lasting changes in brain network self-regulation up to two months, but these neural changes do not translate to sustained long-term behavioral improvements in attention.
Neural self-regulation persists at 2 months without sustained attention gains; leaves open durability of behavioral effects for clinical translation.
Neurofeedback allows for learning voluntary control over one’s own brain activity, aiming to enhance cognition and clinical symptoms. A recent study improved sustained attention temporarily by training healthy participants to up-regulate the differential activity of the sustained attention network (SAN) minus the default mode network (DMN). However, long-term learning effects of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback training remain under-explored. Here, we evaluate the effects of network-based fMRI neurofeedback training for sustained attention by assessing behavioral and brain measures before, one day after, and two months after training. The behavioral measures include task as well as questionnaire scores, and the brain measures include activity and connectivity during self-regulation runs without feedback (i.e., transfer runs) and during resting-state runs. Neurally, we found that participants maintained their ability to control the differential activity during follow-up sessions. Further, exploratory analyses showed that the training-induced increase in FC between the DMN and occipital gyrus was maintained during follow-up transfer runs, but not during follow-up resting-state runs. Behaviorally, we found that enhanced sustained attention right after training returned to baseline level during follow-up. The discrepancy between lasting regulation-related brain changes but transient behavioral and resting-state effects raises the question of how neural changes induced by neurofeedback training translate to potential behavioral improvements. Since neurofeedback directly targets brain measures to indirectly improve behavior long-term, a better understanding of the brain-behavior associations during and after neurofeedback training is needed to develop its full potential as a promising scientific and clinical tool. Key points Participants were still able to self-regulate the differential activity between large-scale networks two months after the end of neurofeedback training and this during transfer runs without feedback. Lasting brain changes were also observed in the functional connectivity of trained regions in runs during which participants engaged in active self-regulation as well as during resting-state runs without concomitant self-regulation. The increased sustained attention we observed right after the end of neurofeedback training did not persist two months later.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pamplona et al. (2021) studied Healthy participants. Network-based fMRI neurofeedback training was evaluated on Behavioral and brain measures (sustained attention and differential activity control). Network-based fMRI neurofeedback training maintained participants' ability to self-regulate brain activity at 2 months, but initial improvements in sustained attention returned to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: